You must know something I don't: risky behavior implies privileged information. - Emory Richardson; Julian Jara-Ettinger (CogSci, 2019)

Does informational independence always matter? Children believe small group discussion is more accurate than ten times as many independent informants. - Emory Richardson; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2020)

Children use agents' response time to distinguish between memory and novel inference. - Emory Richardson; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2020)

You can't trust an angry group: asymmetric evaluations of angry and surprised rhetoric affect confidence in trending opinions. - Emory Richardson; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2021)

"He only changed his answer because they shouted at him": children use affective cues to distinguish between genuine and forced consensus. - Emory Richardson; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2022)

Know your network: people infer cultural drift from network structure, and expect collaborating with more distant experts to improve innovation, but collaborating with network-neighbors to improve memory. - Emory Richardson; Daniela Miro-Rivera; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2022)

Agenda setting and The Emperor's New Clothes: people infer that letting powerful agents make their opinion known early can trigger information cascades and pluralistic ignorance. - Emory Richardson; Isaac Davis; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2023)

Herding cats: children's intuitive theories of persuasion predict slower collective decisions in larger and more diverse groups, but disregard factional power. - Emory Richardson; Hannah Hok; Alex Shaw; Frank Keil (CogSci, 2023)