A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 1991)

A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 1993)

An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic. - Henry Prakken (Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 1993)

From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 1995)

On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (ICAIL, 1995)

A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (FAPR, 1996)

A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Artif. Intell. Law, 1996)

Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning. - Henry Prakken (Stud Logica, 1996)

Contrary-to-Duty Obligations. - Henry Prakken; Marek J. Sergot (Stud Logica, 1996)

Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (ICAIL, 1997)

Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report). - Henry Prakken (ModelAge Workshop, 1997)

Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (J. Appl. Non Class. Logics, 1997)

Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Artif. Intell. Law, 1998)

A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Artificial Intelligence Today, 1999)

Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology. - Henry Prakken; Thomas F. Gordon (Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies, 1999)

On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. - Henry Prakken (JELIA, 2000)

Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics. - Gerard Vreeswijk; Henry Prakken (JELIA, 2000)

Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models. - Eveline T. Feteris; Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2000)

Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2001)

Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure? - Henry Prakken (Fundam. Informaticae, 2001)

Relating Protocols For Dynamic Dispute With Logics For Defeasible Argumentation. - Henry Prakken (Synth., 2001)

The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, 2002)

Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. - Henry Prakken (NMR, 2002)

An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2002)

The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? - Hugo de Bruin; Henry Prakken; Jörgen S. Svensson (Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, 2003)

Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence. - Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001; Douglas Walton (ICAIL, 2003)

Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations. - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001; Douglas Walton (Artif. Intell. Law, 2003)

Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction. - Gerhard Brewka; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (J. Log. Comput., 2003)

Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; James B. Freeman; Hanns Hohmann; Henry Prakken (Argumentation Machines, 2004)

A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation. - Jelle van Veenen; Henry Prakken (ArgMAS, 2005)

A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. - Jelle van Veenen; Henry Prakken (AAMAS, 2005)

A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2005)

Dialogues about the burden of proof. - Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001; Douglas Walton (ICAIL, 2005)

Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. - Pieter Dijkstra; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Kees de Vey Mestdagh (Artif. Intell. Law, 2005)

Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. - Henry Prakken (J. Log. Comput., 2005)

Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2006)

Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. - Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2006)

Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence. - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Bart Verhey (JURIX, 2006)

Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (JURIX, 2006)

Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. - Henry Prakken (Knowl. Eng. Rev., 2006)

Artificial Intelligence & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes. - Henry Prakken (Arguing on the Toulmin Model, 2006)

Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. - Floris J. Bex; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2007)

AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. - Susan W. van den Braak; Gerard Vreeswijk; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2007)

An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. - Pieter Dijkstra; Henry Prakken; Kees de Vey Mestdagh (ICAIL, 2007)

Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (ICAIL, 2007)

Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. - Jobien Sombekke; Tom M. van Engers; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2007)

Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. - Régis Riveret; Antonino Rotolo; Giovanni Sartor; Henry Prakken; Bram Roth (JURIX, 2007)

The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. - Thomas F. Gordon; Henry Prakken; Douglas Walton (Artif. Intell., 2007)

Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. - Thomas L. van der Weide; Frank Dignum; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (ArgMAS, 2008)

Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2008)

Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2008)

Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation. - Régis Riveret; Henry Prakken; Antonino Rotolo; Giovanni Sartor (COMMA, 2008)

The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. - Susan W. van den Braak; Herre van Oostendorp; Gerard Vreeswijk; Henry Prakken (ICLS (3), 2008)

Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation. - Henry Prakken (JELIA, 2008)

Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. - Susan W. van den Braak; Herre van Oostendorp; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (JURIX, 2008)

More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (JURIX, 2008)

A formal model of adjudication dialogues. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2008)

Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2008)

Introducing the Logic and Law Corner. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (J. Log. Comput., 2008)

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009)

Models of Persuasion Dialogue. - Henry Prakken (Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009)

Preface. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Simon Parsons; Henry Prakken (AAAI Fall Symposium: The Uses of Computational Argumentation, 2009)

Practical Reasoning Using Values. - Thomas L. van der Weide; Frank Dignum; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (ArgMAS, 2009)

Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. - Sindhu Joseph; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2009)

A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2009)

Research challenges for argumentation. - Jürgen Dix; Simon Parsons; Henry Prakken; Guillermo Ricardo Simari (Comput. Sci. Res. Dev., 2009)

Editorial: Logic and Law Corner. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (J. Log. Comput., 2009)

A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues. - Eric M. Kok; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (ArgMAS, 2010)

Arguing about Preferences and Decisions. - Thomas L. van der Weide; Frank Dignum; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (ArgMAS, 2010)

A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001 (COMMA, 2010)

Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2010)

A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2010)

Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2010)

A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. - Floris J. Bex; Peter J. van Koppen; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (Artif. Intell. Law, 2010)

Reports of the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia. - Roger Azevedo; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Gautam Biswas; Ted Carmichael; Nancy L. Green; Mirsad Hadzikadic; Oluwasanmi Koyejo; Unmesh Kurup; Simon Parsons; Roberto Pirrone; Henry Prakken; Alexei V. Samsonovich; et al. (AI Mag., 2010)

An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. - Henry Prakken (Argument Comput., 2010)

Multi-criteria Argument Selection in Persuasion Dialogues. - Thomas L. van der Weide; Frank Dignum; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (ArgMAS, 2011)

A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios. - Eric M. Kok; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Herre van Oostendorp; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (EUMAS, 2011)

Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken; Wietske Visser (ICAIL, 2011)

Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation. - Bas van Gijzel; Henry Prakken (IJCAI, 2011)

Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (IJCAI, 2011)

On modelling burdens and standards of proof in structured argumentation. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (JURIX, 2011)

Testing the benfits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues. - Eric M. Kok; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Gerard Vreeswijk (AAMAS, 2012)

Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation. - Henry Prakken (Logic Programs, Norms and Action, 2012)

Resolutions in Structured Argumentation. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2012)

Clarifying some misconceptions on the ASPIC+ framework. - Henry Prakken; Sanjay Modgil (COMMA, 2012)

Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC+ framework. - Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2012)

A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Michal Araszkiewicz; Kevin D. Ashley; Katie Atkinson; Floris Bex; Filipe Borges; Danièle Bourcier; Paul Bourgine; Jack G. Conrad; Enrico Francesconi; Thomas F. Gordon; Guido Governatori; et al. (Artif. Intell. Law, 2012)

Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2012)

Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. - Bas van Gijzel; Henry Prakken (Argument Comput., 2012)

An appreciation of John Pollock's work on the computational study of argument. - Henry Prakken; John F. Horty (Argument Comput., 2012)

Risk Assessment as an Argumentation Game. - Henry Prakken; Dan Ionita; Roel J. Wieringa (CLIMA, 2013)

Representing and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian Network. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (CMN, 2013)

Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values. - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken; Adam Z. Wyner; Katie Atkinson (ICAIL, 2013)

Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian network. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2013)

Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions. - Katie Atkinson; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Henry Prakken; Adam Z. Wyner (JURIX, 2013)

Formalising arguments about norms. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (JURIX, 2013)

Unfolding Crime Scenarios with Variations: A Method for Building a Bayesian Network for Legal Narratives. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2013)

A general account of argumentation with preferences. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell., 2013)

On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format. - Floris Bex; Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001 (J. Log. Comput., 2013)

Combining Paraconsistent Logic with Argumentation. - Diana Grooters; Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2014)

A Tool for the Generation of Arguments from Bayesian Networks. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (COMMA, 2014)

On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations. - Henry Prakken (ECAI, 2014)

Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2014)

Extracting Scenarios from a Bayesian Network as Explanations for Legal Evidence. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2014)

Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (Artif. Intell. Law, 2014)

Introduction to structured argumentation. - Philippe Besnard; Alejandro Javier García; Anthony Hunter; Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken; Guillermo Ricardo Simari; Francesca Toni (Argument Comput., 2014)

The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (Argument Comput., 2014)

Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning. - Henry Prakken (Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, 2015)

Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (ECSQARU, 2015)

A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2015)

Demonstration of a structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2015)

Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemes. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2015)

Explaining Legal Bayesian Networks Using Support Graphs. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2015)

Capturing Critical Questions in Bayesian Network Fragments: - Extended abstract. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2015)

Representing the Quality of Crime Scenarios in a Bayesian Network. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2015)

Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (Artif. Intell., 2015)

A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. - Henry Prakken; Adam Z. Wyner; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Katie Atkinson (J. Log. Comput., 2015)

Rethinking the Rationality Postulates for Argumentation-Based Inference. - Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2016)

A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios. - Charlotte S. Vlek; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (Artif. Intell. Law, 2016)

An analysis of critical-link semantics with variable degrees of justification. - Bin Wei 006; Henry Prakken (Argument Comput., 2016)

Two Aspects of Relevance in Structured Argumentation: Minimality and Paraconsistency. - Diana Grooters; Henry Prakken (J. Artif. Intell. Res., 2016)

Refining a Heuristic for Constructing Bayesian Networks from Structured Arguments. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Linda C. van der Gaag; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (BNCAI, 2017)

On Relating Abstract and Structured Probabilistic Argumentation: A Case Study. - Henry Prakken (ECSQARU, 2017)

On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for dutch law. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2017)

Argument Schemes for Discussing Bayesian Modellings of Complex Criminal Cases. - Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2017)

Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J). - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Tom M. van Engers; Bart Verheij (Artif. Intell. Law, 2017)

On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2017)

Towards Artificial Argumentation. - Katie Atkinson; Pietro Baroni; Massimiliano Giacomin; Anthony Hunter; Henry Prakken; Chris Reed 001; Guillermo Ricardo Simari; Matthias Thimm; Serena Villata (AI Mag., 2017)

Abstract Rule-Based Argumentation. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (FLAP, 2017)

Historical Overview of Formal Argumentation. - Henry Prakken (FLAP, 2017)

A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks. - Sjoerd T. Timmer; John-Jules Ch. Meyer; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij; Bart Verheij (Int. J. Approx. Reason., 2017)

Abstraction in Argumentation: Necessary but Dangerous. - Henry Prakken; Michiel De Winter (COMMA, 2018)

Exploiting Causality in Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Legal Arguments. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (JURIX, 2018)

Probabilistic Strength of Arguments with Structure. - Henry Prakken (KR, 2018)

Corrigendum to "A general account of argumentation with preferences" [Artif. Intell. 195 (2013) 361-397]. - Sanjay Modgil; Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell., 2018)

Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Labeled Arguments. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (ECSQARU, 2019)

Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+. - Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2019)

Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (ICAIL, 2019)

Comparing Alternative Factor- and Precedent-Based Accounts of Precedential Constraint. - Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2019)

On Validating Theories of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. - Henry Prakken (CMNA@COMMA, 2020)

Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (COMMA, 2020)

In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law. - Katie Atkinson; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon; Floris Bex; Thomas F. Gordon; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor; Bart Verheij (Artif. Intell. Law, 2020)

A new use case for argumentation support tools: supporting discussions of Bayesian analyses of complex criminal cases. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2020)

A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. - Zeynep Akata; Dan Balliet; Maarten de Rijke; Frank Dignum; Virginia Dignum; Guszti Eiben; Antske Fokkens; Davide Grossi; Koen V. Hindriks; Holger H. Hoos; Hayley Hung; Catholijn M. Jonker; et al. (Computer, 2020)

An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case. - Henry Prakken (Top. Cogn. Sci., 2020)

Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law. - Henry Prakken; Floris Bex; Anne Ruth Mackor (Top. Cogn. Sci., 2020)

A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP. - Alejandro Javier García; Henry Prakken; Guillermo Ricardo Simari (Theory Pract. Log. Program., 2020)

Philosophical Reflections on Argument Strength and Gradual Acceptability. - Henry Prakken (ECSQARU, 2021)

On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2021)

Can Predictive Justice Improve the Predictability and Consistency of Judicial Decision-Making? - Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2021)

A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell. Law, 2021)

Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (Int. J. Approx. Reason., 2021)

Justifications Derived from Inconsistent Case Bases Using Authoritativeness. - Joeri Peters; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (ArgXAI@COMMA, 2022)

Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts. - Giuseppe Pisano; Roberta Calegari; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (COMMA, 2022)

Formalising an Aspect of Argument Strength: Degrees of Attackability. - Henry Prakken (COMMA, 2022)

Justification in Case-Based Reasoning. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (ArgXAI@COMMA, 2022)

Landmarks in Case-Based Reasoning: From Theory to Data. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (HHAI, 2022)

Measuring the Complexity of Dutch Legislation. - Tim van den Belt; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2022)

Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. - Giovanni Sartor; Michal Araszkiewicz; Katie Atkinson; Floris Bex; Tom M. van Engers; Enrico Francesconi; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sileno; Frank Schilder; Adam Wyner 001; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon (Artif. Intell. Law, 2022)

Correction: thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. - Giovanni Sartor; Michal Araszkiewicz; Katie Atkinson; Floris Bex; Tom M. van Engers; Enrico Francesconi; Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sileno; Frank Schilder; Adam Wyner 001; Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon (Artif. Intell. Law, 2022)

A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: Formalisation and experiments. - Henry Prakken; Rosa Ratsma (Argument Comput., 2022)

Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs. - Remi Wieten; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken; Silja Renooij (Argument Comput., 2022)

On Floating Conclusions. - Daniela Schuster 001; Jan M. Broersen; Henry Prakken (DEON, 2023)

Justification, stability and relevance for case-based reasoning with incomplete focus cases. - Daphne Odekerken; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2023)

Model- and data-agnostic justifications with A Fortiori Case-Based Argumentation. - Joeri G. T. Peters; Floris J. Bex; Henry Prakken (ICAIL, 2023)

A Formal Framework for Combining Legal Reasoning Methods. - Henry Prakken; Giovanni Sartor (ICAIL, 2023)

Hierarchical Precedential Constraint. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (ICAIL, 2023)

Precedent-Based Reasoning with Incomplete Cases. - Daphne Odekerken; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2023)

Hierarchical a Fortiori Reasoning with Dimensions. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2023)

Relating Abstract and Structured Accounts of Argumentation Dynamics: the Case of Expansions. - Henry Prakken (KR, 2023)

Explaining Model Behavior with Global Causal Analysis. - Marcel Robeer; Floris Bex; Ad Feelders; Henry Prakken (xAI (1), 2023)

When is argumentation deductive? - Henry Prakken (J. Appl. Non Class. Logics, 2023)

Arguments Based on Domain Rules in Prediction Justifications. - Joeri Peters; Floris Bex; Henry Prakken (CMNA@COMMA, 2024)

On Evaluating Legal-Reasoning Capabilities of Generative AI. - Henry Prakken (CMNA@COMMA, 2024)

An Application of Case-Based Reasoning to Decision-Making in Dutch Administrative Law. - Joep Nouwens; AnneMarie Borg; Henry Prakken (JURIX, 2024)

A Case-Based-Reasoning Analysis of the COMPAS Dataset. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (JURIX, 2024)

An abstract and structured account of dialectical argument strength. - Henry Prakken (Artif. Intell., 2024)

A Fortiori Case-Based Reasoning: From Theory to Data. - Wijnand van Woerkom; Davide Grossi; Henry Prakken; Bart Verheij (J. Artif. Intell. Res., 2024)

Experimental evaluation of gradual argument acceptability semantics: The case of reinstatement. - Elfia Bezou-Vrakatseli; Henry Prakken; Christian P. Janssen (Argument Comput., 2025)