Jian Wang

Orcid: 0000-0003-0520-737X

Affiliations:
  • University of Leuven, Department of Managerial Economics, Strategy and Innovation, Belgium
  • Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, Atlanta, GA, USA (PhD 2013)
  • Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance, Berlin, Germany


According to our database1, Jian Wang authored at least 15 papers between 2011 and 2021.

Collaborative distances:
  • Dijkstra number2 of four.
  • Erdős number3 of four.

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Dataset
Other 

Links

Online presence:

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2021
Two tales of science technology linkage: Patent in-text versus front-page references.
CoRR, 2021

2020
Measuring originality in science.
Scientometrics, 2020

2019
Extracting and Matching Patent In-text References to Scientific Publications.
Proceedings of the 4th Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (BIRNDL 2019) co-located with the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2019), 2019

2017
Search for evergreens in science: A functional data analysis.
J. Informetrics, 2017

2015
Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence.
J. Informetrics, 2015

Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

2014
Collaboration and creativity: effects of tie strength.
PhD thesis, 2014

Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations.
J. Informetrics, 2014

How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?
J. Informetrics, 2014

Multinational R&D in China: differentiation and integration of global R&D networks.
Int. J. Technol. Manag., 2014

2013
Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation.
Scientometrics, 2013

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).
J. Informetrics, 2013

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed one (P100).
CoRR, 2013

2012
A boosted-trees method for name disambiguation.
Scientometrics, 2012

2011
Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011


  Loading...