Mo Chen
Orcid: 0000-0002-2876-2176Affiliations:
- Technical University of Munich, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Germany
- University of Bristol, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, UK (PhD 2022)
According to our database1,
Mo Chen
authored at least 10 papers
between 2019 and 2025.
Collaborative distances:
Collaborative distances:
Timeline
Legend:
Book In proceedings Article PhD thesis Dataset OtherLinks
Online presence:
-
on orcid.org
On csauthors.net:
Bibliography
2025
A Comparative Analysis of Two Data-Driven Mechanisms for Behavioral Change: Nudging and the Chinese Social Credit System.
Digit. Soc., April, 2025
2024
Digit. Gov. Res. Pract., December, 2024
Social Scoring Systems for Behavioral Regulation: An Experiment on the Role of Transparency in Determining Perceptions and Behaviors.
Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES-24) - Full Archival Papers, October 21-23, 2024, San Jose, California, USA, 2024
2023
Factors Influencing Perceived Legitimacy of Social Scoring Systems: Subjective Privacy Harms and the Moderating Role of Transparency.
Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Information Systems, 2023
E-government HCI in China: How Does the Government Communicate a New Regulation System to the Public?
Asian CHI, 2023
2022
Ordinary People as Moral Heroes and Foes: Digital Role Model Narratives Propagate Social Norms in China's Social Credit System.
Proceedings of the AIES '22: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Oxford, United Kingdom, May 19, 2022
2021
The Transparency of the Chinese Social Credit System from the Perspective of German Organizations.
Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems, 2021
Blacklists and Redlists in the Chinese Social Credit System: Diversity, Flexibility, and Comprehensiveness.
Proceedings of the AIES '21: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, 2021
2020
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol., 2020
2019
Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior.
Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2019