Alberto Martín-Martín

Scientometrics, 2021

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Large coverage fluctuations in Google Scholar: a case study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2021

2019

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019

2018

Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Rodrigo Costas

Thed N. van Leeuwen

J. Informetrics, 2018

Google Scholar: the 'big data' bibliographic tool.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2018

Unbundling Open Access dimensions: a conceptual discussion to reduce terminology inconsistencies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Rodrigo Costas

Thed N. van Leeuwen

CoRR, 2018

Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2018

2017

Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

The lost academic home: institutional affiliation links in Google Scholar Citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2017

Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Anne-Wil Harzing

J. Informetrics, 2017

Google Scholar and the gray literature: A reply to Bonato's review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2017

Classic papers: déjà vu, a step further in the bibliometric exploitation of Google Scholar.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2017

2016

Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

A two-sided academic landscape: portrait of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar (1950-2013).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2016

The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2016

2016 Google Scholar Metrics released: a matter of languages... and something else.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2016

Proceedings Scholar Metrics: H Index of proceedings on Computer Science, Electrical & Electronic Engineering, and Communications according to Google Scholar Metrics (2010-2014).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2016

2015

Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2015

<i>Nature</i>'s top 100 Re-revisited.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Improvements in Google Scholar Citations are for the summer: creating an institutional affiliation link feature.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2015

Reviving the past: the growth of citations to old documents.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2015

2014

The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2014

About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2014

Empirical Evidences in Citation-Based Search Engines: Is Microsoft Academic Search dead?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2014

Proceedings Scholar Metrics: H Index of proceedings on Computer Science, Electrical & Electronic Engineering, and Communications according to Google Scholar Metrics (2009-2013).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2014

Does Google Scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950-2013)?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]