Mike Thelwall

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., March, 2024

The accuracy of field classifications for journals in Scopus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Stephen Pinfield

Scientometrics, February, 2024

Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Learn. Publ., January, 2024

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2024

2023

Word Association Thematic Analysis: Insight Discovery from the Social Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

SN Comput. Sci., November, 2023

What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Subreena Simrick

Ian Viney

Peter van den Besselaar

Scientometrics, November, 2023

In which fields are citations indicators of research quality?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., August, 2023

In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, July, 2023

Why are coauthored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., July, 2023

Journal and disciplinary variations in academic open peer review anonymity, outcomes, and length.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Libr. Inf. Sci., June, 2023

Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? Evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., May, 2023

Are successful co-authors more important than first authors for publishing academic journal articles?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, April, 2023

Can first or last name uniqueness help to identify diaspora researchers from any country?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., April, 2023

Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, February, 2023

Is big team research fair in national research assessments? The case of the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., February, 2023

Why are medical research articles tweeted? The news value perspective.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Tint Hla Hla Htoo

Jin-Cheon Na

Scientometrics, January, 2023

Predicting article quality scores with machine learning: The U.K. Research Excellence Framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023

Is research funding always beneficial? A cross-disciplinary analysis of U.K. research 2014-20.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cristina I. Font Julián

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023

Data sharing and reuse practices: disciplinary differences and improvements needed.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2023

Does the perceived quality of interdisciplinary research vary between fields?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2023

Terms in journal articles associating with high quality: can qualitative research be world-leading?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2023

Are Scopus journal field classifications ever misleading?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Stephen Pinfield

CoRR, 2023

2022

Guest Editorial: Sentiment Analysis as a Multidisciplinary Research Area.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., 2022

The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-19.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Scientometrics, 2022

A systematic method for identifying references to academic research in grey literature.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Scientometrics, 2022

Scopus 1900-2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Research coauthorship 1900-2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Researching women and men 1996-2020: Is androcentrism still dominant?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Abdullah Abrizah

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Covid-19 refereeing duration and impact in major medical journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Are data repositories fettered? A survey of current practices, challenges and future technologies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2022

Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996-2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

José-Antonio Ontalba-Ruipérez

Learn. Publ., 2022

Which types of online resource support US patent claims?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cristina I. Font Julián

J. Informetrics, 2022

Small female citation advantages for US journal articles in medicine.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2022

I'm Nervous about Sharing This Secret with You: Youtube Influencers Generate Strong Parasocial Interactions by Discussing Personal Issues.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2022

Can REF output quality scores be assigned by AI? Experimental evidence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Artificial intelligence technologies to support research assessment: A review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Why are co-authored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Is Research Funding Always Beneficial? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of UK Research 2014-20.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cristina I. Font Julián

CoRR, 2022

Are internationally co-authored journal articles better quality? The UK case 2014-2020.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Predicting article quality scores with machine learning: The UK Research Excellence Framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Can AI-estimated article quality be used to rank scholarly documents?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval co-located with 44th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2022), 2022

2021

Word Association Thematic Analysis: A Social Media Text Exploration Strategy

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, ISBN: 978-3-031-02324-8, 2021

Exploring WorldCat identities as an altmetric information source: a library catalog analysis experiment in the field of Scientometrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Daniel Torres-Salinas

Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado

Scientometrics, 2021

Researchers' attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007-2020: criticism and acceptance.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Alternative medicines worth researching? Citation analyses of acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and osteopathy 1996-2017.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Correction to: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Measuring the impact of biodiversity datasets: data reuse, citations and altmetrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Female contributions to high-energy physics in a wider context: Commentary on an article by Strumia.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

A Bayesian hurdle quantile regression model for citation analysis with mass points at lower values.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Marzieh Shahmandi

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Which types of online evidence show the nonacademic benefits of research? Websites cited in UK impact case studies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2021

Male, Female, and Nonbinary Differences in UK Twitter Self-descriptions: A Fine-grained Systematic Exploration.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2021

How Has Covid-19 Affected Published Academic Research? A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Mentioning the Virus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2021

"My ADHD Hellbrain": A Twitter Data Science Perspective on a Behavioural Disorder.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2021

Lifestyle information from YouTube influencers: some consumption patterns.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2021

Do new research issues attract more citations? A comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2021

Male or female gender-polarized YouTube videos are less viewed.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

David Foster

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2021

This! Identifying New Sentiment Slang Through Orthographic Pleonasm Online: Yasss Slay Gorg Queen Ilysm.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Erik Cambria

IEEE Intell. Syst., 2021

Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Tamara Nevill

CoRR, 2021

Cures, Treatments and Vaccines for Covid-19: International differences in interest on Twitter.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2021

Can Twitter Give Insights into International Differences in Covid-19 Vaccination? Eight countries' English tweets to 21 March 2021.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2021

A Bayesian Two-part Hurdle Quantile Regression Model for Citation Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Marzieh Shahmandi

CoRR, 2021

2020

Data in Brief: Can a mega-journal for data be useful?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2020

Mid-career field switches reduce gender disparities in academic publishing.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2020

A new algorithm for zero-modified models applied to citation counts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Marzieh Shahmandi

Scientometrics, 2020

Can the impact of grey literature be assessed? An investigation of UK government publications cited by articles and books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Scientometrics, 2020

Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

How common are explicit research questions in journal articles?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

A gender equality paradox in academic publishing: Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first-author gender disparities between fields.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

All downhill from the PhD? The typical impact trajectory of U.S. academic careers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996-2014.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Pot, kettle: Nonliteral titles aren't (natural) science.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Coronavirus research before 2020 is more relevant than ever, especially when interpreted for COVID-19.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Mendeley reader counts for US computer science conference papers and journal articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but coauthor contributions are hard to evaluate.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

In memoriam Judit Bar-Ilan.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Google Books, Scopus, Microsoft Academic, and Mendeley for impact assessment of doctoral dissertations: A multidisciplinary analysis of the UK.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Identifying Data Sharing and Reuse with Scholix: Potentials and Limitations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Catherine J. Pink

Patterns, 2020

Automatically detecting open academic review praise and criticism.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2020

Who shares health and medical scholarly articles on Facebook?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Nilofar Barahmand

Learn. Publ., 2020

Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2020

Female citation impact superiority 1996-2018 in six out of seven English-speaking nations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2020

Which health and biomedical topics generate the most Facebook interest and the strongest citation relationships?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2020

All downhill from the PhD? The typical impact trajectory of US academic careers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2020

Retweeting for COVID-19: Consensus building, information sharing, dissent, and lockdown life.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2020

Covid-19 Tweeting in English: Gender Differences.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2020

A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets: consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2020

Why we Need Another Ten Years of Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval co-located with 42nd European Conference on Information Retrieval, 2020

2019

Web of Science and Scopus language coverage.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta

Scientometrics, 2019

No evidence of citation bias as a determinant of STEM gender disparities in US biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology research.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Tamara Nevill

Scientometrics, 2019

Are classic references cited first? An analysis of citation order within article sections.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2019

The influence of highly cited papers on field normalised indicators.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2019

Do Mendeley reader counts indicate the value of arts and humanities research?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2019

Reader and author gender and genre in Goodreads.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2019

Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

Should citations be counted separately from each originating section?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

An Automatic Method to Identify Citations to Journals in News Stories: A Case Study of UK Newspapers Citing Web of Science Journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2019

The reading background of Goodreads book club members: a female fiction canon?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Karen Bourrier

J. Documentation, 2019

She's Reddit: A source of statistically significant gendered interest information?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Stuart

Inf. Process. Manag., 2019

Which image types do universities tweet?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Stuart

First Monday, 2019

Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000 post-publication open peer review publishing model.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2019

Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but co-author contributions are hard to evaluate.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2019

Readership Data and Research Impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2019

New developments in scientometric and informetric research.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

Data Citation and Reuse Practice in Biodiversity - Challenges of Adopting a Standard Citation Model.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

A New Algorithm for Zero-Modified Models Applied to Citation Counts.

[BibT_eX]

Marzieh Hounejani

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

Online Indicators for Non-Standard Academic Outputs.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019

Readership Data and Research Impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019

2018

Do gendered citation advantages influence field participation? Four unusual fields in the USA 1996-2017.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Can Microsoft Academic be used for citation analysis of preprint archives? The case of the Social Science Research Network.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Differences between journals and years in the proportions of students, researchers and faculty registering Mendeley articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

A decade of Garfield readers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Does Microsoft Academic find early citations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2018

Gender bias in machine learning for sentiment analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2018

Gender bias in sentiment analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2018

Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Tamara Nevill

J. Informetrics, 2018

Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Which US and European Higher Education Institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG score?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Benedetto Lepori

Bareerah Hafeez Hoorani

J. Informetrics, 2018

Can Microsoft Academic assess the early citation impact of in-press articles? A multi-discipline exploratory analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Can social news websites pay for content and curation? The SteemIt cryptocurrency model.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2018

National scientific performance evolution patterns: Retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2018

How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2018

Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2018

Gender differences in research areas and topics: An analysis of publications in 285 fields.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2018

YouTube science channel video presenters and comments: female friendly or vestiges of sexism?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2018

Can museums find male or female audiences online with YouTube?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2018

Do prestigious Spanish scholarly book publishers have more teaching impact?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Reshmi Gopalakrishna Pillai

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2018

Detection of Stress and Relaxation Magnitudes for Tweets.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Reshmi Gopalakrishna Pillai

Constantin Orasan

Proceedings of the Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018, 2018

What Makes You Stressed? Finding Reasons From Tweets.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Constantin Orasan

Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, 2018

2017

Is medical research informing professional practice more highly cited? Evidence from AHFS DI Essentials in drugs.com.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Judit Bar-Ilan: information scientist, computer scientist, scientometrician.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Avoiding obscure topics and generalising findings produces higher impact research.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineering.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Kuku Joseph Aduku

Scientometrics, 2017

An investigation of the online presence of UK universities on Instagram.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Stuart

Online Inf. Rev., 2017

Does Mendeley provide evidence of the educational value of journal articles?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Learn. Publ., 2017

Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2017

The research production of nations and departments: A statistical model for the share of publications.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2017

The accuracy of confidence intervals for field normalised indicators.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2017

Microsoft Academic: A multidisciplinary comparison of citation counts with Scopus and Mendeley for 29 journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2017

Confidence intervals for normalised citation counts: Can they delimit underlying research capability?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2017

Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2017

Data Science Altmetrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2017

SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends: A professional site with academic and educational uses.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Goodreads: A social network site for book readers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Book genre and author gender: Romance>Paranormal-Romance to Autobiography>Memoir.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Web citations in patents: Evidence of technological impact?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

News stories as evidence for research? BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Patent citation analysis with Google.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

TensiStrength: Stress and relaxation magnitude detection for social media texts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2017

Sentiment Analysis Is a Big Suitcase.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

IEEE Intell. Syst., 2017

Gender and image sharing on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp in the UK: Hobbying alone or filtering for friends?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Farida Vis

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2017

Do journal data sharing mandates work? Life sciences evidence from Dryad.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2017

Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2017

2016

Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, ISBN: 978-3-031-02304-0, 2016

Are citations from clinical trials evidence of higher impact research? An analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

Can alternative indicators overcome language biases in citation counts? A comparison of Spanish and UK research.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

Stopped sum models and proposed variants for citation data.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Wan Jing Low

Scientometrics, 2016

Long term productivity and collaboration in information science.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

Figshare: a universal repository for academic resource sharing?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2016

National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

Citation count distributions for large monodisciplinary journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

Not dead, just resting: The practical value of per publication citation indicators.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

Are there too many uncited articles? Zero inflated variants of the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

Are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2016

Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Does research with statistics have more impact? The citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Mendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Chatting through pictures? A classification of images tweeted in one week in the UK and USA.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Academic software downloads from Google Code: useful usage indicators?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Res., 2016

2015

Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Robert J. W. Tijssen

Scientometrics, 2015

Which are the best innovation support infrastructures for universities? Evidence from R&D output and commercial activities.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2015

Clustering research group website homepages.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2015

Book editors in the social sciences and humanities: an analysis of publication and collaboration patterns of established researchers in Flanders.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Truyken L. B. Ossenblok

Raf Guns

Learn. Publ., 2015

The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2015

Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2015

More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2015

National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2015

The megaphone of the people? Spanish SentiStrength for real-time analysis of political tweets.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

David Vilares

Miguel A. Alonso

J. Inf. Sci., 2015

Arts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please, just data.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Maria M. Delgado

J. Documentation, 2015

Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

How is research blogged? A content analysis approach.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Hadas Shema

Judit Bar-Ilan

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015

The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Xuemei Li

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015

What's Special about Book Editors? A Bibliometric Comparison of Book Editors and other Flemish Researchers in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

[BibT_eX]

Truyken L. B. Ossenblok

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

Stopped Sum Models for Citation Data.

[BibT_eX]

Wan Jing Low

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

How often are Patients Interviewed in Health Research? An Informetric Approach.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

Alternative Metrics for Book Impact Assessment: Can Choice Reviews be a Useful Source?

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

2014

Substance without citation: evaluating the online impact of grey literature.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Evaluating altmetrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Automatic classification of academic web page types.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Kim Holmberg

Scientometrics, 2014

Sixty-four years of informetrics research: productivity, impact and collaboration.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Abdullah Abrizah

Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh

Scientometrics, 2014

Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2014

Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2014

No citation advantage for monograph-based collaborations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2014

The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2014

Hyperlinks as inter-university collaboration indicators.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2014

Successful researchers publicizing research online: An outlink analysis of European highly cited scientists' personal websites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2014

Internet Jokes: The Secret Agents of Globalization?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Limor Shifman

Hadar Levy

J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2014

Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Hadas Shema

Judit Bar-Ilan

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

arXiv E-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Can the impact of non-Western academic books be measured? An investigation of Google Books and Google Scholar for Malaysia.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Abdullah Abrizah

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

it Inf. Technol., 2014

The role of emotional variables in the classification and prediction of collective social dynamics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2014

2013

Predicting Emotional Responses to Long Informal Text.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., 2013

Seeing Stars of Valence and Arousal in Blog Posts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., 2013

Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2013

Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2013

Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2013

Topic-based sentiment analysis for the social web: The role of mood and issue-related words.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Lognormal distributions of user post lengths in Internet discussions - a consequence of the Weber-Fechner law?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

EPJ Data Sci., 2013

The entrepreneurial role of the University: a link analysis of York Science Park

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2013

Motivation for hyperlink creation using inter-page relationships.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2013

Adolescent Suicide Statements on MySpace.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw., 2013

Semi-supervised vs. Cross-domain Graphs for Sentiment Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Natalia Ponomareva

Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2013

More than Bag-of-Words: Sentence-based Document Representation for Sentiment Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2013

Mapping DH through heterogeneous communicative practices.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference of the Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, 2013

Damping Sentiment Analysis in Online Communication: Discussions, Monologs and Dialogs.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 2013

2012

Twitter, MySpace, Digg: Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis in Social Media.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 2012

Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2012

Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Xuemei Li

Dean M. Giustini

Scientometrics, 2012

Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2012

An international comparison of journal publishing and citing behaviours.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Ali Gazni

J. Informetrics, 2012

Measuring the web impact of digitised scholarly resources.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Kathryn E. Eccles

Eric T. Meyer

J. Documentation, 2012

Trending Twitter topics in English: An international comparison.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Farida Vis

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Sentiment strength detection for the social web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Mapping the network structure of science parks: An exploratory study of cross-sectoral interactions reflected on the web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2012

Do Neighbours Help? An Exploration of Graph-based Algorithms for Cross-domain Sentiment Classification.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Natalia Ponomareva

Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, 2012

Biographies or Blenders: Which Resource Is Best for Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Natalia Ponomareva

Proceedings of the Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 2012

Library and information science in the big data era: Funding, projects, and future [a panel proposal].

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Ying Ding

Proceedings of the Information, Interaction, Innovation: Celebrating the Past, Constructing the Present and Creating the Future, 2012

2011

CYBEREMOTIONS - Collective Emotions in Cyberspace.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 2nd European Future Technologies Conference and Exhibition, 2011

A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Sentiment in Twitter events.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Charles Oppenheim

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2011

Clandestine chatters: Self-disclosure in U.K. chat room profiles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Chris Fullwood

Sam O'Neill

First Monday, 2011

Emotional Analysis of Blogs and Forums Data

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2011

Collective emotions online and their influence on community life

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2011

A comparison of link and URL citation counting.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2011

University of Wolverhampton at the TREC 2011 Microblog Track.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of The Twentieth Text REtrieval Conference, 2011

An Interdisciplinary VR-architecture for 3D Chatting with Non-verbal Communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the JVRC11: Joint Virtual Reality Conference of EGVE, 2011

Privacy and Gender in the Social Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Privacy Online, 2011

2010

From sentence to emotion: a real-time three-dimensional graphics metaphor of emotions extracted from text.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Vis. Comput., 2010

Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2010

Flickr's potential as an academic image resource: An exploratory study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Angus

J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2010

Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Informetrics, 2010

Social network site changes over time: The case of MySpace.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Sukhvinder Uppal

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Public dialogs in social network sites: What is their purpose?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Policy-relevant Webometrics for individual scientific fields.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Sentiment in short strength detection informal text.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Can the impact of scholarly images be assessed online? An exploratory study using image identification technology.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

Webometrics: emergent or doomed?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Res., 2010

Emotion Homophily in Social Network Site Messages.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

First Monday, 2010

Negative emotions accelerating users activity in BBC Forum

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2010

Motivations for image publishing and tagging on flickr.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Angus

Proceedings of the Publishing in the networked world: Transforming the Nature of Communication, 2010

A Study of Information Retrieval Weighting Schemes for Sentiment Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the ACL 2010, 2010

Social Networking and e-Research.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the World Wide Research - Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities., 2010

Identifying Winners and Losers: The Role of Webometrics.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the World Wide Research - Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities., 2010

2009

Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, ISBN: 978-3-031-02261-6, 2009

Scientific Web Intelligence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining, Second Edition (4 Volumes), 2009

The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2009

Local government web sites in Finland: A geographic and webometric analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Kim Holmberg

Scientometrics, 2009

MySpace comments.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2009

Sentiment analysis: A combined approach.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2009

Handbook of Research on Web Log Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Homophily in MySpace.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Assessing global diffusion with Web memetics: The spread and evolution of a popular joke.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Limor Shifman

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

The Dimensions of Web Site Credibility and Their Relation to Active Trust and Behavioural Impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2009

A longitudinal analysis of alternative document models.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2009

Social Network Sites: Users and Uses.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Adv. Comput., 2009

Communication-based influence components model.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Persuasive Technology, Fourth International Conference, 2009

Preliminary findings that can be used when assessing the advantages and limitations of using bibliometric data in the assessment of Economics research.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Charles Oppenheim

Proceedings of the Thriving on Diversity: Information Opportunities in a Pluralistic World, 2009

2008

A university-centred European Union link analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Alesia A. Zuccala

Scientometrics, 2008

Patterns of annual citation of highly cited articles and the prediction of their citation ranking: A comparison across subjects.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2008

Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2008

No place for news in social network web sites?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2008

General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Emma Angus

Online Inf. Rev., 2008

Finding and tracking subjects within an ongoing debate.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2008

Bibliometrics to webometrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2008

Longitudinal trends in academic web links.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2008

Do academic link types change over time?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2008

Developing network indicators for ideological landscapes from the political blogosphere in South Korea.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Han Woo Park

J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2008

Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Paul Wouters

Jenny Fry

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Quantitative comparisons of search engine results.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines: Case study windows live.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

A statistical analysis of the web presences of European life sciences research teams.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Franz Barjak

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Evolving debates in online communication: a graph analytical approach.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Internet Res., 2008

Text in social networking Web sites: A word frequency analysis of Live Spaces.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

First Monday, 2008

Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2008

Website Credibility, Active Trust and Behavioural Intent.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Persuasive Technology, Third International Conference, 2008

2007

A longitudinal study of academic webs: Growth and stabilisation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2007

Blog search engines.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Laura Hasler

Online Inf. Rev., 2007

Blog searching: The first general-purpose source of retrospective public opinion in the social sciences?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2007

Generating overview timelines for major events in an RSS corpus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Mikhail Alexandrov

J. Informetrics, 2007

Word statistics in Blogs and RSS feeds: Towards empirical universal evidence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Renaud Lambiotte

Marcel Ausloos

J. Informetrics, 2007

UK academic web links and collaboration - an exploratory study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2007

Web intelligence analyses of digital libraries: A case study of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2007

RUOK? Blogging Communication Technologies During Crises.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2007

Identifying and characterizing public science-related fears from RSS feeds.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Franz Barjak

Xuemei Li

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Which types of news story attract bloggers?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aidan Byrne

Melissa Goody

Inf. Res., 2007

Can Brotherhood Be Sold Like Soap...Online? An Online Social Marketing and Advocacy Pilot Study Synopsis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Persuasive Technology, 2007

2006

Weblinks and gender in science: An exploratory analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Franz Barjak

Hildrun Kretschmer

Scientometrics, 2006

Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2006

Web-science communication in the age of globalization.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Han Woo Park

New Media Soc., 2006

Web issue analysis: An integrated water resource management case study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Katie Vann

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

Web crawling ethics revisited: Cost, privacy, and denial of service.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

Are raw RSS feeds suitable for broad issue scanning? A science concern case study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

Language evolution and the spread of ideas on the Web: A procedure for identifying emergent hybrid word family members.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Liz Price

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

The BBC, <i>Daily Telegraph</i> and Wikinews timelines of the terrorist attacks of 7th July 2006 in London: a comparison with contemporary discussions.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Iina Hellsten

Inf. Res., 2006

Automated Web issue analysis: A nurse prescribing case study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2006

Amanda Spink, Bernhard J. Jansen, Web Search: Public Searching of the Web, Information and Knowledge Management Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN: 1402022689.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2006

A comparison of feature selection methods for an evolving RSS feed corpus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2006

LexiURL web link analysis for digital libraries.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Alesia A. Zuccala

Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2006

2005

National and international university departmental Web site interlinking.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2005

Text characteristics of English language university Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005

The clustering power of low frequency words in academic Webs.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Liz Price

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005

A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns: the case of Canadian universities.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2005

Mathematical models for academic webs: Linear relationship or non-linear power law?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2005

Academic home pages: Reconstruction of the self.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Lesley Thoms

First Monday, 2005

The limits of Web-based empowerment: Integrated water resource management case studies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Adrian Barlow

Katie Vann

First Monday, 2005

Scientific web intelligence: finding relationships in university webs.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Commun. ACM, 2005

Webometrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Lennart Björneborn

Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005

What's the Deal with the Web/Blogs/the Next Big Technology: A Key Role for Information Science in e-Social Science Research?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Paul Wouters

Proceedings of the Context: Nature, Impact, and Role, 2005

2004

Patterns of national and international Web inlinks to US academic departments: An analysis of disciplinary variations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2004

Can the Web give useful information about commercial uses of scientific research?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2004

Can Personal Web Pages that Link to Universities Yield Information about the Wider Dissemination of Research?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2004

Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2004

Webometrics: An introduction to the special issue.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2004

Do the Web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2004

Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2004

Finding similar academic Web sites with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2004

Methods for reporting on the targets of links from national systems of university Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Process. Manag., 2004

Escher Staircases on the World Wide Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Ronald Rousseau

First Monday, 2004

New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2004

Vocabulary Spectral Analysis as an Exploratory Tool for Scientific Web Intelligence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004

2003

Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Liz Price

Scientometrics, 2003

Disciplinary and linguistic considerations for academic Web linking: An exploratory hyperlink mediated study with Mainland China and Taiwan.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2003

A method for identifying clusters in sets of interlinking Web spaces.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2003

The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of Computer Science Departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2003

Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2003

Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2003

Why Do Web Sites from Different Academic Subjects Interlink?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2003

Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2003

A layered approach for investigating the topological structure of communities in the Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2003

Can Google's PageRank be used to find the most important academic Web pages?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2003

Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web: A Review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Han Woo Park

J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2003

Scholarly Use of the Web: What Are the Key Inducers of Links to Journal Web Sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Liwen Qiu Vaughan

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

Graph structure in three national academic Webs: Power laws with anomalies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

Three target document range metrics for university web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003

What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Res., 2003

Sharing and accessing Internet resources across barriers of nation, language, and collection. Sponsored by SIG III, MGT.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Humanizing Information Technology: From Ideas to Bits and Back, 2003

2002

Interlinking between Asia-Pacific University Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Alastair G. Smith

Scientometrics, 2002

European Union associated university websites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2002

Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Alastair G. Smith

Scientometrics, 2002

Research dissemination and invocation on the Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2002

Research note: in praise of Google: finding law journal Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2002

Subject gateway sites and search engine ranking.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2002

The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2002

A Guide to Finding Quality Information on the Internet (2nd ed.).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2002

A research and institutional size-based model for national university Web site interlinking.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2002

Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university Web site interlinking.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2002

Mining the World Wide Web: An Information Search Approach.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2002

A comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2002

Conceptualizing documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2002

Methodologies for crawler based Web surveys.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Internet Res., 2002

An initial exploration of the link relationship between UK university Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2002

Web link counts correlate with ISI impact factors: Evidence from two disciplines.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Information, Connetcitons and Community, 2002

Exploring the pattern of links between Chinese university Web sites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Information, Connetcitons and Community, 2002

2001

Exploring the link structure of the Web with network diagrams.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2001

A web crawler design for data mining.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Inf. Sci., 2001

Results from a web impact factor crawler.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2001

Extracting macroscopic information from Web links.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2001

Commercial Web site links.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Internet Res., 2001

Web log file analysis: backlinks and queries.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2001

2000

Web impact factors and search engine coverage.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2000

Commercial Web sites: lost in cyberspace?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Internet Res., 2000

Who is using the .co.uk domain? Professional and media adoption of the web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Int. J. Inf. Manag., 2000

Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Comput. Educ., 2000

Implications of Search Engine Coverage on the Viability of Business Web Sites.

[BibT_eX]