Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Orcid: 0000-0003-3299-2772

According to our database1, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva authored at least 67 papers between 2015 and 2024.

Collaborative distances:
  • Dijkstra number2 of five.
  • Erdős number3 of four.

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Dataset
Other 

Links

Online presence:

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2024
The inaccurate representation of an author's publishing name, and impact on reference accuracy.
Scientometrics, May, 2024

The incidence of 11 movie titles in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers.
Scientometrics, May, 2024

Citations to papers published in European Science Editing from 2020 to 2022: assessment using Scopus, Dimensions, Google Scholar, and Altmetrics.
Scientometrics, March, 2024

From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper.
Scientometrics, January, 2024

Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills.
Learn. Publ., January, 2024

Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in <i>PLOS ONE</i> and the challenges of appropriate attribution.
J. Data Inf. Sci., 2024

Twitter should now be referred to as X: How academics, journals and publishers need to make the nomenclatural transition.
CoRR, 2024

2023
Can the principle of the 'right to be forgotten' be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post-publication peer review.
Learn. Publ., October, 2023

Partial citation analysis of five classes of retracted papers, and devising a new four-tier citation classification system for retracted (and other) papers.
Scientometrics, August, 2023

Who, if anyone, has the right to accept or refuse unwanted citations?
Scientometrics, July, 2023

Human- and AI-based authorship: Principles and ethics.
Learn. Publ., July, 2023

Archiving website-based references in academic papers: Problems caused by reference rot, potential solutions and limitations.
Learn. Publ., July, 2023

Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with "paper mills".
J. Data Inf. Sci., April, 2023

Letter to the editor: Should stricter regulations be set for the use or analysis of Twitter (and other social media) in academic publishing?
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2023

2022
Should ORCID Be Mandatory for Authors, but Not for Editors?
Oper. Res. Forum, 2022

Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness.
Learn. Publ., 2022

Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market.
Learn. Publ., 2022

Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war.
Learn. Publ., 2022

2021
The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation.
Scientometrics, 2021

Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19.
Scientometrics, 2021

A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers.
Scientometrics, 2021

Abuse of ORCID's weaknesses by authors who use paper mills.
Scientometrics, 2021

The Matthew effect impacts science and academic publishing by preferentially amplifying citations, metrics and status.
Scientometrics, 2021

The i100-index, i1000-index and i10, 000-index: expansion and fortification of the Google Scholar h-index for finer-scale citation descriptions and researcher classification.
Scientometrics, 2021

CiteScore: risk of copy-cat, fake and misleading metrics.
Scientometrics, 2021

Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers.
Publ., 2021

Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit.
Online Inf. Rev., 2021

Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations.
Online Inf. Rev., 2021

2020
The Ethical and Academic Implications of the Jeffrey Beall (www.scholarlyoa.com) Blog Shutdown.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2020

Reproducibility issues with correlating Beall-listed publications and research awards at a small Canadian business school.
Scientometrics, 2020

Spam emails in academia: issues and costs.
Scientometrics, 2020

The ethics of publishing in two languages.
Scientometrics, 2020

Disparities in document indexation in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) among six subject domains, and the impact on journal-based metrics.
Scientometrics, 2020

Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals.
Scientometrics, 2020

2019
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2019

Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors?
Scientometrics, 2019

Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions.
Scientometrics, 2019

Did the Research Faculty at a Small Canadian Business School Publish in "Predatory" Venues? This Depends on the Publishing Blacklist.
Publ., 2019

Africa's challenges in the OA movement: risks and possibilities.
Online Inf. Rev., 2019

Challenges to open peer review.
Online Inf. Rev., 2019

How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall's lists of "predatory" publications.
J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc., 2019

A new dimension in publishing ethics: social media-based ethics-related accusations.
J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc., 2019

2018
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2018

Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2018

Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2018

"Data Not Shown" is No Longer Excusable in Biomedical Publishing.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2018

Reflection on the Fazlul Sarkar versus PubPeer ("John Doe") Case.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2018

Citation inflation: the effect of not correcting the scientific literature sufficiently, a case study in the plant sciences.
Scientometrics, 2018

Rejoinder to "Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes".
Scientometrics, 2018

Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes.
Scientometrics, 2018

The Google Scholar h-index: useful but burdensome metric.
Scientometrics, 2018

The opacity of the PubPeer Foundation: what PubPeer's "About" page tells us.
Online Inf. Rev., 2018

2017
Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

Copy-Paste: 2-Click Step to Success and Productivity that Underlies Self-Plagiarism.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

What Rights Do Authors Have?
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?
Scientometrics, 2017

Highly cited retracted papers.
Scientometrics, 2017

Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?
Scientometrics, 2017

Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies?
Scientometrics, 2017

Nested self-citation: the citation of a paper's least divisible unit.
Scientometrics, 2017

The false Donald J. Trump article and the ethics of misleading journalism.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

2016
Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective.
Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2016

The Importance of the Anonymous Voice in Postpublication Peer Review.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

2015
Do open access data files represent an academic Risk?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015


  Loading...