Sarah J. Lewis

According to our database1, Sarah J. Lewis authored at least 13 papers between 2013 and 2020.

Collaborative distances:
  • Dijkstra number2 of five.
  • Erdős number3 of four.

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Other 

Links

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2020
Student perceptions of remote access simulated learning in computed tomography.
Interact. Learn. Environ., 2020

Investigating the potential of a gist-sensitive computer-aided detection tool.
Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2020: Image Perception, 2020

2019
Does the strength of the gist signal predict the difficulty of breast cancer detection in usual presentation and reporting mechanisms?
Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, 2019

2018
Knowledge and practice of computed tomography exposure parameters amongst radiographers in Jordan.
Comput. Biol. Medicine, 2018

Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
Comput. Biol. Medicine, 2018

Towards clinic-friendly solutions for patient trials in breast cancer phase contrast imaging.
Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, 2018

Detection of the abnormal gist in the prior mammograms even with no overt sign of breast cancer.
Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, 2018

2016
The impact of radiology expertise upon the localization of subtle pulmonary lesions.
Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2016: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, San Diego, California, United States, 27 February, 2016

Investigating the link between the radiological experience and the allocation of an 'equivocal finding'.
Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2016: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, San Diego, California, United States, 27 February, 2016

The classification of normal screening mammograms.
Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2016: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, San Diego, California, United States, 27 February, 2016

Lower Recall Rates Reduced Readers' Sensitivity in Screening Mammography.
Proceedings of the Breast Imaging, 2016

Breast Asymmetry, Distortion and Density Are Key Factors for False Positive Decisions.
Proceedings of the Breast Imaging, 2016

2013
Optimization of Computed Tomography Protocols: Limitations of a Methodology Employing a Phantom with Location-Known Opacities.
J. Digit. Imaging, 2013


  Loading...