Hans-Dieter Daniel
Orcid: 0000-0001-7925-1846
According to our database1,
Hans-Dieter Daniel
authored at least 56 papers
between 1990 and 2019.
Collaborative distances:
Collaborative distances:
Timeline
Legend:
Book In proceedings Article PhD thesis Dataset OtherLinks
On csauthors.net:
Bibliography
2019
Scientometrics, 2019
How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach.
J. Informetrics, 2019
How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ).
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019
2018
The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher's performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model.
J. Informetrics, 2018
2017
Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data.
J. Informetrics, 2017
The effect of the "very important paper" (VIP) designation in <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i> on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017
Assessment Criteria for Early Career Researcher's Proposals in the Humanities.
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2017
2016
2015
Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
2013
Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
2012
The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors.
Scientometrics, 2012
Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
Scientometrics, 2012
In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Scientometrics, 2012
Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor.
J. Informetrics, 2012
What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
J. Informetrics, 2012
2011
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry.
Scientometrics, 2011
The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i>.
Scientometrics, 2011
Learn. Publ., 2011
A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants.
J. Informetrics, 2011
Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i> by using percentile rank classes.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
2010
A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?
Scientometrics, 2010
The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>.
Scientometrics, 2010
Learn. Publ., 2010
J. Informetrics, 2010
J. Informetrics, 2010
Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2010
Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Proceedings of the Publishing in the networked world: Transforming the Nature of Communication, 2010
2009
A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of <i>Chemical Abstracts</i>.
Scientometrics, 2009
The influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models.
Scientometrics, 2009
Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts.
J. Informetrics, 2009
Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2009
The publication and citation impact profiles of <i>Angewandte Chemie</i> and the <i>Journal of the American Chemical Society</i> based on the sections of <i>Chemical Abstracts: </i> A case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009
Do we need the <i>h</i> index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009
Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator <i>c</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> = <i>c</i>/<i>c</i><sub>0</sub> at the micro level using data from chemistry.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009
2008
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication.
Scientometrics, 2008
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study.
J. Informetrics, 2008
J. Documentation, 2008
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the <i>h</i> index? A comparison of nine different variants of the <i>h</i> index using data from biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008
Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>, or rejected but published elsewhere.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008
2007
Scientometrics, 2007
Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors.
J. Informetrics, 2007
Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications.
J. Informetrics, 2007
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007
2006
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants.
Scientometrics, 2006
2005
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions.
Scientometrics, 2005
Learn. Publ., 2005
1990
Scientometrics, 1990
Introduction: Quantitative science and technology indicators studies in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Scientometrics, 1990