Lutz Bornmann

Orcid: 0000-0003-0810-7091

According to our database1, Lutz Bornmann authored at least 362 papers between 2004 and 2024.

Collaborative distances:
  • Dijkstra number2 of four.
  • Erdős number3 of four.

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Dataset
Other 

Links

Online presence:

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2024
What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
Scientometrics, January, 2024

2023
Saudi Arabia research: academic insights and trend analysis.
Scientometrics, October, 2023

Identification of potential young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences: A bibliometric approach.
J. Informetrics, August, 2023

John Mearsheimer's academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist's oeuvre.
Scientometrics, July, 2023

Which papers cited which tweets? An exploratory analysis based on Scopus data.
J. Informetrics, May, 2023

Efficiency of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide: The introduction of a new input indicator reflecting institutional staff numbers.
J. Informetrics, May, 2023

Measuring university size: A comparison of academic personnel versus scientific talent pool data.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023

What do we know about the disruption indicator in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
CoRR, 2023

How to measure research performance of single scientists? A proposal for an index based on scientific prizes: The Prize Winner Index (PWI).
CoRR, 2023

2022
Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered.
Scientometrics, 2022

Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: a software tutorial.
Scientometrics, 2022

Relevance of document types in the scores' calculation of a specific field-normalized indicator: Are the scores strongly dependent on or nearly independent of the document type handling?
Scientometrics, 2022

Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators.
Scientometrics, 2022

Scores of a specific field-normalized indicator calculated with different approaches of field-categorization: Are the scores different or similar?
J. Informetrics, 2022

Corrigendum to "Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data" Journal of Informetrics Volume 11, Issue 3, August 2017, Pages 788-799.
J. Informetrics, 2022

Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields: Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example.
J. Informetrics, 2022

Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers?
J. Informetrics, 2022

Identification of young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences using bibliometric data.
CoRR, 2022

Revolutions in science: The proposal of an approach for the identification of most important researchers, institutions, and countries based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS).
CoRR, 2022

2021
A call for governments to pause Twitter censorship: using Twitter data as social-spatial sensors of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 research diffusion.
Scientometrics, 2021

On the disruptive power of small-teams research.
Scientometrics, 2021

Improved clusterings and visualizations of 11, 359 journals in the JCRs 2015.
Scientometrics, 2021

A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies.
Scientometrics, 2021

Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers.
Scientometrics, 2021

Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores.
Scientometrics, 2021

Investigating dissemination of scientific information on Twitter: A study of topic networks in opioid publications.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics?
J. Informetrics, 2021

Is culture related to strong science? An empirical investigation.
J. Informetrics, 2021

Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts.
J. Informetrics, 2021

Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics .
J. Inf. Sci., 2021

Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: Three RPYS analyzes in the course of Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th ISSI conference.
CoRR, 2021

Report on Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2021).
CoRR, 2021

Heat Waves - a hot topic in climate change research.
CoRR, 2021

Quantum technology 2.0 - topics and contributing countries from 1980 to 2018.
CoRR, 2021

Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups: A new excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores.
CoRR, 2021

Investigating Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge on Twitter: A Study of Topic Networks of Opioid Publications.
CoRR, 2021

2020
"Interdisciplinarity" and "Synergy" in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan.
Scientometrics, 2020

Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
Scientometrics, 2020

Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
Scientometrics, 2020

An evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact, and a proposal for making them better.
Scientometrics, 2020

Correction to: Normalisation of citation impact in economics.
Scientometrics, 2020

Thomas theorem in research evaluation.
Scientometrics, 2020

Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan's research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer.
Scientometrics, 2020

Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019).
Scientometrics, 2020

Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance.
Scientometrics, 2020

Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton's book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications?
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Does the <i>h</i><sub>α</sub>-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Bibliometrics-based decision trees (BBDTs) based on bibliometrics-based heuristics (BBHs): Visualized guidelines for the use of bibliometrics in research evaluation.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

Corrigendum to "Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags" [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695-707].
J. Informetrics, 2020

Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching.
J. Informetrics, 2020

Research diversification and its relationship with publication counts and impact: A case study based on Australian professors.
J. Inf. Sci., 2020

How to identify the roots of broad research topics and fields? The introduction of RPYS sampling using the example of climate change research.
J. Inf. Sci., 2020

Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention.
J. Data Inf. Sci., 2020

Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases.
CoRR, 2020

Are papers addressing certain diseases perceived where these diseases are prevalent? The proposal to use Twitter data as social-spatial sensors.
CoRR, 2020

Which papers cited which tweets? An empirical analysis based on Scopus data.
CoRR, 2020

Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of computer science papers from Eastern Europe.
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2020

2019
What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018.
Scientometrics, 2019

h<sub>α</sub>: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo.
Scientometrics, 2019

The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor.
Scientometrics, 2019

R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science).
Scientometrics, 2019

Normalisation of citation impact in economics.
Scientometrics, 2019

How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators.
Scientometrics, 2019

Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics.
Scientometrics, 2019

Productivity does not equal usefulness.
Scientometrics, 2019

Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation.
Scientometrics, 2019

How Efficiently Do Elite US Universities Produce Highly Cited Papers?
Publ., 2019

Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?
J. Informetrics, 2019

Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient.
J. Informetrics, 2019

Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags.
J. Informetrics, 2019

Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data.
J. Informetrics, 2019

The value and credits of <i>n</i>-authors publications.
J. Informetrics, 2019

MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to the comment by Smolinsky (in press).
J. Informetrics, 2019

Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF).
J. Informetrics, 2019

Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents - such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach.
J. Informetrics, 2019

Spatial bibliometrics on the city level.
J. Inf. Sci., 2019

Hot and cold spots in the US research: A spatial analysis of bibliometric data on the institutional level.
J. Inf. Sci., 2019

The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2019

Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2019

Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers.
CoRR, 2019

Is culture a contributing factor of strong science?
CoRR, 2019

Citation concept analysis (CCA) - A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by two exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
CoRR, 2019

Does the h<sub>α</sub> index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R.
CoRR, 2019

The Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) and the Journal Impact Factor: A Non‑Parametric Alternative.
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement?
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

Societal Impact Measurement of Research Papers.
Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019

2018
Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer.
Scientometrics, 2018

Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change.
Scientometrics, 2018

Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity - A tribute to Eugene Garfield.
Scientometrics, 2018

The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science.
Scientometrics, 2018

Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data.
Scientometrics, 2018

Identifying "hot papers" and papers with "delayed recognition" in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores.
Scientometrics, 2018

Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare "like with like"!
Scientometrics, 2018

Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield's publications.
Scientometrics, 2018

Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis.
Scientometrics, 2018

Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention.
Scientometrics, 2018

Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph.
Scientometrics, 2018

Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations.
Scientometrics, 2018

Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity.
Scientometrics, 2018

Which research institution performs better than average in a subject category or better than selected other institutions?
Online Inf. Rev., 2018

Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
J. Informetrics, 2018

Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature.
J. Informetrics, 2018

Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting.
J. Informetrics, 2018

Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics.
J. Informetrics, 2018

MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to Smolinsky and Marx (2018).
J. Informetrics, 2018

Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data.
J. Informetrics, 2018

The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK.
J. Informetrics, 2018

Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data.
J. Documentation, 2018

"Smart girls" versus "sleeping beauties" in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2018

The Second-order h-type Indicators for Identifying Top Units.
Data Inf. Manag., 2018

I3: A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor.
CoRR, 2018

Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied?
CoRR, 2018

Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of networks based on author keywords and hashtags.
CoRR, 2018

hα: The Scientist as Chimpanzee or Bonobo.
CoRR, 2018

Do altmetrics assess societal impact in the same way as case studies? An empirical analysis testing the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF).
CoRR, 2018

The value and credits of n-authors publications.
CoRR, 2018

Opium in science and society: Numbers.
CoRR, 2018

The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences.
CoRR, 2018

The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: national and international citations in papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and UK.
CoRR, 2018

2017
Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy.
Scientometrics, 2017

Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming.
Scientometrics, 2017

Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification.
Scientometrics, 2017

How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data.
Scientometrics, 2017

Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method.
Scientometrics, 2017

Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?
Scientometrics, 2017

Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press).
Scientometrics, 2017

Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?
Scientometrics, 2017

Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings.
Scientometrics, 2017

Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany.
Scientometrics, 2017

Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors.
Scientometrics, 2017

Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data.
J. Informetrics, 2017

Use of the journal impact factor as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers: A rejoinder on a comment by Peters (2017).
J. Informetrics, 2017

Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data.
J. Informetrics, 2017

Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data.
J. Informetrics, 2017

The Power-weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator: Testing the "Tournaments" Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies.
J. Data Inf. Sci., 2017

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

An empirical look at the nature index.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Field- and time-normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data.
CoRR, 2017

Do bibliometrics and altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime, altmetrics, and citation data.
CoRR, 2017

The geography of references in elite articles: What countries contribute to the archives of knowledge.
CoRR, 2017

Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting and related topics.
CoRR, 2017

Model for Explaining Citations in Scholarly Publications: A Conceptual Overview of the Literature.
CoRR, 2017

Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family.
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2017

2016
New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer).
Scientometrics, 2016

At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014.
Scientometrics, 2016

Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references - a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics.
Scientometrics, 2016

Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators - a state-of-the-art report.
Scientometrics, 2016

Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level.
Scientometrics, 2016

Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: a bibliometric analysis.
Scientometrics, 2016

Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?
Scientometrics, 2016

How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index.
Scientometrics, 2016

Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany.
Scientometrics, 2016

To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics.
Online Inf. Rev., 2016

Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis: Response to discussants.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Proposal of a minimum constraint for indicators based on means or averages.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Excellence networks in science: A Web-based application based on Bayesian multilevel logistic regression (BMLR) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Efficiency of research performance and the glass researcher.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Count regression models in informetrics.
J. Informetrics, 2016

Replicability and the public/private divide.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies".
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Overlay maps based on Mendeley data: The use of altmetrics for readership networks.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? A new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy.
Frontiers Res. Metrics Anal., 2016

Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy with Cited References Disambiguation.
CoRR, 2016

Professional and Citizen Bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators.
CoRR, 2016

A Reproducible Journal Classification and Global Map of Science Based on Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations.
CoRR, 2016

Referenced Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) and Algorithmic Historiography: The Bibliometric Reconstruction of András Schubert's Œuvre.
CoRR, 2016

Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics.
CoRR, 2016

The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded.
CoRR, 2016

Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley data.
CoRR, 2016

Expected values in percentile indicators.
CoRR, 2016

2015
An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany.
Scientometrics, 2015

Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of "Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy" (RPYS).
Scientometrics, 2015

On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science.
Scientometrics, 2015

How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study.
Scientometrics, 2015

Discussion about the new Nature Index.
Scientometrics, 2015

Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations).
Scientometrics, 2015

The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures.
Scientometrics, 2015

Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers' database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany.
Scientometrics, 2015

Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications.
Scientometrics, 2015

Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics.
Scientometrics, 2015

Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics.
PeerJ Comput. Sci., 2015

Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?
J. Informetrics, 2015

Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time.
J. Informetrics, 2015

Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley.
J. Informetrics, 2015

Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

<i>Nature</i>'s top 100 revisited.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Complex tasks and simple solutions: The use of heuristics in the evaluation of research.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Excellence networks in science: A web-based application (www.excellence-networks.net) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully.
CoRR, 2015

Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How is climate change research perceived in policy documents?
CoRR, 2015

Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A first empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator.
CoRR, 2015

t factor: A metric for measuring impact on Twitter.
CoRR, 2015

Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime.
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015

Who Publishes, Reads, and Cites Papers? An Analysis of Country Information.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

2014
Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches.
Scientometrics, 2014

How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations.
Scientometrics, 2014

How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons.
Scientometrics, 2014

Ranking institutions by the handicap principle.
Scientometrics, 2014

Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models.
Online Inf. Rev., 2014

The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations.
J. Informetrics, 2014

Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST.
J. Informetrics, 2014

What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide.
J. Informetrics, 2014

How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?
J. Informetrics, 2014

On the meaningful and non-meaningful use of reference sets in bibliometrics.
J. Informetrics, 2014

Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime.
J. Informetrics, 2014

Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics.
J. Informetrics, 2014

h-Index research in scientometrics: A summary.
J. Informetrics, 2014

Correction.
J. Informetrics, 2014

Assigning publications to multiple subject categories for bibliometric analysis: An empirical case study based on percentiles.
J. Documentation, 2014

Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS).
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

On scientific misconduct.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

The wisdom of citing scientists.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

On the function of university rankings.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Do we still need peer review? An argument for change - By T.H.P. Gould.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of "References Publication Years spectrosopy" (RPYS).
CoRR, 2014

The substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions: Guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals.
CoRR, 2014

Recent Developments in China-U.S. Science Cooperation.
CoRR, 2014

The "Tournaments" Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies: Power-Weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator.
CoRR, 2014

The Generation of Large Networks from Web-of-Science Data.
CoRR, 2014

A macro level scientometric analysis of world tribology research output (1998 - 2012).
CoRR, 2014

Study of Citation Networks in Tribology Research.
CoRR, 2014

Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis.
CoRR, 2014

Measuring impact in research evaluations.
CoRR, 2014

Which kind of papers has higher or lower altmetric counts? A study using article-level metrics from PLOS and F1000Prime.
CoRR, 2014

Measuring the broader impact of research: The potential of altmetrics.
CoRR, 2014

Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review.
CoRR, 2014

How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature.
CoRR, 2014

On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective.
CoRR, 2014

2013
The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle.
Scientometrics, 2013

The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach.
Scientometrics, 2013

The Normalization of Citation Counts Based on Classification Systems.
Publ., 2013

Research Misconduct - Definitions, Manifestations and Extent.
Publ., 2013

How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects.
J. Informetrics, 2013

The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis.
J. Informetrics, 2013

The advantage of the use of samples in evaluative bibliometric studies.
J. Informetrics, 2013

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).
J. Informetrics, 2013

The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits.
J. Informetrics, 2013

The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000.
J. Informetrics, 2013

The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations.
J. Informetrics, 2013

A better alternative to the h index.
J. Informetrics, 2013

Fallout and miss in journal peer review.
J. Documentation, 2013

How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012).
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Standards for the application of bibliometrics in the evaluation of individual researchers working in the natural sciences
CoRR, 2013

The historical roots of iMetrics: Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS) routinized and applied to Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and (a subset of) JASIST.
CoRR, 2013

Conceptual funding of a new citation-rank approach in bibliometrics: P100.
CoRR, 2013

Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed one (P100).
CoRR, 2013

2012
Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative.
Scientometrics, 2012

Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking.
Scientometrics, 2012

Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
Scientometrics, 2012

The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor.
Scientometrics, 2012

In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Scientometrics, 2012

The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review.
Scientometrics, 2012

What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
J. Informetrics, 2012

Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information.
J. Informetrics, 2012

HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front.
J. Informetrics, 2012

Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches.
J. Informetrics, 2012

The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011.
J. Informetrics, 2012

Journal peer review as an information retrieval process.
J. Documentation, 2012

Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (<i>I3</i>).
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

The Anna Karenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualization of results from multi-level models
CoRR, 2012

Field-normalized Impact Factors: A Comparison of Rescaling versus Fractionally Counted IFs
CoRR, 2012

How to analyse percentile impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes and top-cited papers.
CoRR, 2012

Citation impact of papers published from six prolific countries: A national comparison based on InCites data
CoRR, 2012

How Can Journal Impact Factors be
CoRR, 2012

2011
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry.
Scientometrics, 2011

The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i>.
Scientometrics, 2011

Mimicry in science?
Scientometrics, 2011

The calculation of the single publication h index and related performances measures: A Web application based on Google Scholar data.
Online Inf. Rev., 2011

Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry.
Learn. Publ., 2011

A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index.
J. Informetrics, 2011

The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science - A visualization approach by using density maps.
J. Informetrics, 2011

Is it necessary to consider suburbs (or small cities in the close proximity) and name variants in a citation impact analysis for bigger cities? An investigation using Munich as an example.
J. Informetrics, 2011

A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants.
J. Informetrics, 2011

Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization.
J. Informetrics, 2011

Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data.
J. Informetrics, 2011

Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010.
J. Informetrics, 2011

Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i> by using percentile rank classes.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Do we need the E-index in addition to the h-index and its variants?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

Percentile Ranks and the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3)
CoRR, 2011

Which cities' paper output and citation impact are above expectation in information science? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches.
CoRR, 2011

The Anna Karenina principle: A mechanism for the explanation of success in science
CoRR, 2011

Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications
CoRR, 2011

Which cities produce excellent papers worldwide more than can be expected? A new mapping approach--using Google Maps--based on statistical significance testing
CoRR, 2011

Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents
CoRR, 2011

Scientific peer review.
Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

2010
How accurately does Thomas Kuhn's model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology? - A historical reconstruction and citation analysis.
Scientometrics, 2010

A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?
Scientometrics, 2010

The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>.
Scientometrics, 2010

Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study.
Learn. Publ., 2010

The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy.
J. Informetrics, 2010

A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications.
J. Informetrics, 2010

The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index.
J. Informetrics, 2010

Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2010

Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper.
J. Informetrics, 2010

Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

How fractional counting affects the Impact Factor: Steps towards field-independent classifications of scholarly journals and literature
CoRR, 2010

Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Proceedings of the Publishing in the networked world: Transforming the Nature of Communication, 2010

2009
The influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models.
Scientometrics, 2009

The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews.
Learn. Publ., 2009

Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts.
J. Informetrics, 2009

Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2009

Do we need the <i>h</i> index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator <i>c</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> = <i>c</i>/<i>c</i><sub>0</sub> at the micro level using data from chemistry.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Citation Environment of Angewandte Chemie
CoRR, 2009

2008
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication.
Scientometrics, 2008

How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study.
J. Informetrics, 2008

Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review.
J. Informetrics, 2008

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior.
J. Documentation, 2008

Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the <i>h</i> index? A comparison of nine different variants of the <i>h</i> index using data from biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>, or rejected but published elsewhere.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

2007
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review.
Scientometrics, 2007

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis.
J. Informetrics, 2007

Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors.
J. Informetrics, 2007

Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications.
J. Informetrics, 2007

What do we know about the <i>h</i> index?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

2006
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants.
Scientometrics, 2006

2005
Does the <i>h</i>-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Scientometrics, 2005

Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions.
Scientometrics, 2005

2004
Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders.
Scientometrics, 2004


  Loading...