Margot van Wermeskerken

According to our database, Margot van Wermeskerken authored at least 8 papers between 2016 and 2023.

Collaborative distances:

• Dijkstra number of six.
• Erdős number of five.

2023

Do social cues in instructional videos affect attention allocation, perceived cognitive load, and learning outcomes under different visual complexity conditions?

Julius Meier, Bastian de Jong, Dorien Preusterink van Montfort, Anouk Verdonschot, Margot van Wermeskerken, Tamara van Gog

J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2023

2022

Looking through Sherlock's eyes: Effects of eye movement modelling examples with and without verbal explanations on deductive reasoning.

Tim van Marlen, Margot van Wermeskerken, Halszka Jarodzka, Maartje E. J. Raijmakers, Tamara van Gog

J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2022

2018

Attention to the model's face when learning from video modeling examples in adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Margot van Wermeskerken, Bianca Grimmius, Tamara van Gog

J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2018

What Am I Looking at? Interpreting Dynamic and Static Gaze Displays.

Margot van Wermeskerken, Damien Litchfield, Tamara van Gog

Cogn. Sci., 2018

Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning.

Margot van Wermeskerken, Susanna Ravensbergen, Tamara van Gog

Comput. Hum. Behav., 2018

Model-observer similarity and task-appropriateness in learning from video modeling examples: Do model and student gender affect test performance, self-efficacy, and perceived competence?

Vincent Hoogerheide, Margot van Wermeskerken, Hilke van Nassau, Tamara van Gog

Comput. Hum. Behav., 2018

2017

Seeing the instructor's face and gaze in demonstration video examples affects attention allocation but not learning.

Margot van Wermeskerken, Tamara van Gog

Comput. Educ., 2017

2016

Showing a model's eye movements in examples does not improve learning of problem-solving tasks.

Tim van Marlen, Margot van Wermeskerken, Halszka Jarodzka, Tamara van Gog

Comput. Hum. Behav., 2016