Henry Prakken

Orcid: 0000-0002-3431-7757

According to our database1, Henry Prakken authored at least 173 papers between 1991 and 2023.

Collaborative distances:

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Dataset
Other 

Links

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2023
When is argumentation deductive?
J. Appl. Non Class. Logics, October, 2023

Explaining Model Behavior with Global Causal Analysis.
Proceedings of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence, 2023

Relating Abstract and Structured Accounts of Argumentation Dynamics: the Case of Expansions.
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2023

Hierarchical a Fortiori Reasoning with Dimensions.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2023

Precedent-Based Reasoning with Incomplete Cases.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2023

Hierarchical Precedential Constraint.
Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023

A Formal Framework for Combining Legal Reasoning Methods.
Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023

Model- and data-agnostic justifications with A Fortiori Case-Based Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023

Justification, stability and relevance for case-based reasoning with incomplete focus cases.
Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023

On Floating Conclusions.
Proceedings of the Deontic Logic and Normative Systems - 16th International Conference, 2023

2022
Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs.
Argument Comput., 2022

A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: Formalisation and experiments.
Argument Comput., 2022

Correction: thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2022

Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2022

Measuring the Complexity of Dutch Legislation.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2022

Landmarks in Case-Based Reasoning: From Theory to Data.
Proceedings of the HHAI 2022: Augmenting Human Intellect, 2022

Justification in Case-Based Reasoning.
Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022), 2022

Formalising an Aspect of Argument Strength: Degrees of Attackability.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2022

Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2022

Justifications Derived from Inconsistent Case Bases Using Authoritativeness.
Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022), 2022

2021
Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction.
Int. J. Approx. Reason., 2021

A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2021

Can Predictive Justice Improve the Predictability and Consistency of Judicial Decision-Making?
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2021

On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making.
Proceedings of the ICAIL '21: Eighteenth International Conference for Artificial Intelligence and Law, São Paulo Brazil, June 21, 2021

Philosophical Reflections on Argument Strength and Gradual Acceptability.
Proceedings of the Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 2021

2020
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP.
Theory Pract. Log. Program., 2020

Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law.
Top. Cogn. Sci., 2020

An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.
Top. Cogn. Sci., 2020

A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
Computer, 2020

A new use case for argumentation support tools: supporting discussions of Bayesian analyses of complex criminal cases.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2020

In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2020

Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2020

On Validating Theories of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks.
Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument co-located with the 8th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2020), 2020

2019
Comparing Alternative Factor- and Precedent-Based Accounts of Precedential Constraint.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2019

Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2019

Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2019

Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Labeled Arguments.
Proceedings of the Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 2019

2018
Corrigendum to "A general account of argumentation with preferences" [Artif. Intell. 195 (2013) 361-397].
Artif. Intell., 2018

Probabilistic Strength of Arguments with Structure.
Proceedings of the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference, 2018

Exploiting Causality in Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Legal Arguments.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2018

Abstraction in Argumentation: Necessary but Dangerous.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2018

2017
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks.
Int. J. Approx. Reason., 2017

Historical Overview of Formal Argumentation.
FLAP, 2017

Abstract Rule-Based Argumentation.
FLAP, 2017

Towards Artificial Argumentation.
AI Mag., 2017

On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2017

Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J).
Artif. Intell. Law, 2017

Argument Schemes for Discussing Bayesian Modellings of Complex Criminal Cases.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2017

On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for dutch law.
Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2017

On Relating Abstract and Structured Probabilistic Argumentation: A Case Study.
Proceedings of the Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 2017

Refining a Heuristic for Constructing Bayesian Networks from Structured Arguments.
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence - 29th Benelux Conference, 2017

2016
Two Aspects of Relevance in Structured Argumentation: Minimality and Paraconsistency.
J. Artif. Intell. Res., 2016

An analysis of critical-link semantics with variable degrees of justification.
Argument Comput., 2016

A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2016

Rethinking the Rationality Postulates for Argumentation-Based Inference.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2016

2015
A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+.
J. Log. Comput., 2015

Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective.
Artif. Intell., 2015

Representing the Quality of Crime Scenarios in a Bayesian Network.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015

Capturing Critical Questions in Bayesian Network Fragments: - Extended abstract.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015

Explaining Legal Bayesian Networks Using Support Graphs.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015

Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemes.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2015

Demonstration of a structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2015

A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2015

Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 2015

Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning.
Proceedings of the Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, 2015

2014
The <i>ASPIC</i><sup>+</sup> framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial.
Argument Comput., 2014

Introduction to structured argumentation.
Argument Comput., 2014

Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2014

Extracting Scenarios from a Bayesian Network as Explanations for Legal Evidence.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014

Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014

On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations.
Proceedings of the ECAI 2014 - 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18-22 August 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, 2014

A Tool for the Generation of Arguments from Bayesian Networks.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2014

Combining Paraconsistent Logic with Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2014

2013
On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format.
J. Log. Comput., 2013

A general account of argumentation with preferences.
Artif. Intell., 2013

Unfolding Crime Scenarios with Variations: A Method for Building a Bayesian Network for Legal Narratives.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013

Formalising arguments about norms.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013

Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013

Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian network.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2013

Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2013

Representing and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian Network.
Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, 2013

Risk Assessment as an Argumentation Game.
Proceedings of the Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, 2013

2012
An appreciation of John Pollock's work on the computational study of argument.
Argument Comput., 2012

Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC<sup>+</sup> framework for structured argumentation.
Argument Comput., 2012

Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2012

A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2012

Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC<sup>+</sup> framework.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2012

Clarifying some misconceptions on the ASPIC<sup>+</sup> framework.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2012

Resolutions in Structured Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2012

Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Logic Programs, Norms and Action, 2012

Testing the benfits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2012

2011
On modelling burdens and standards of proof in structured argumentation.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2011

Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation.
Proceedings of the IJCAI 2011, 2011

Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation.
Proceedings of the IJCAI 2011, 2011

Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation.
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2011

A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios.
Proceedings of the Multi-Agent Systems - 9th European Workshop, 2011

Multi-criteria Argument Selection in Persuasion Dialogues.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - 8th International Workshop, 2011

2010
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.
Argument Comput., 2010

Reports of the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia.
AI Mag., 2010

A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2010

Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2010

A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2010

Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, 2010

A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, 2010

Arguing about Preferences and Decisions.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - 7th International Workshop, 2010

A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - 7th International Workshop, 2010

2009
Editorial: Logic and Law Corner.
J. Log. Comput., 2009

Research challenges for argumentation.
Comput. Sci. Res. Dev., 2009

A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2009

Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus.
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009

Practical Reasoning Using Values.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 6th International Workshop, 2009

Preface.
Proceedings of the Uses of Computational Argumentation, 2009

Models of Persuasion Dialogue.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009

2008
Introducing the Logic and Law Corner.
J. Log. Comput., 2008

Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2008

A formal model of adjudication dialogues.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2008

More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2008

Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2008

Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation.
Proceedings of the Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 11th European Conference, 2008

The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts.
Proceedings of the Cre8ing a learning world: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, 2008

Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, 2008

Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, 2008

Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, 2008

Personality-Based Practical Reasoning.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, Fifth International Workshop, 2008

2007
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.
Artif. Intell., 2007

Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2007

Argumentation structures in legal dossiers.
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007

Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion.
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007

An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation.
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007

<i>AVERs</i>: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence.
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007

Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence.
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007

2006
Artificial Intelligence & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.
Proceedings of the Arguing on the Toulmin Model, 2006

Formal systems for persuasion dialogue.
Knowl. Eng. Rev., 2006

Presumptions and Burdens of Proof.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2006

Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence.
Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2006

Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, 2006

Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments.
Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, 2006

2005
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation.
J. Log. Comput., 2005

Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2005

Dialogues about the burden of proof.
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2005

A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning.
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2005

A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation.
Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), 2005

A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation.
Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, Second International Workshop, 2005

2004
Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice.
Proceedings of the Argumentation Machines, New Frontiers in Argument and Computation., 2004

2003
Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction.
J. Log. Comput., 2003

Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2003

Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence.
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003

The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong?
Proceedings of the Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, 2003

2002
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2002

Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies.
Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002), 2002

The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey.
Proceedings of the Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, 2002

2001
Relating Protocols For Dynamic Dispute With Logics For Defeasible Argumentation.
Synth., 2001

Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?
Fundam. Informaticae, 2001

Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure.
Proceedings of the Eigths International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2001

2000
Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models.
Artif. Intell. Law, 2000

Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics.
Proceedings of the Logics in Artificial Intelligence, European Workshop, 2000

On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments.
Proceedings of the Logics in Artificial Intelligence, European Workshop, 2000

1999
Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology.
Proceedings of the Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies, 1999

A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities.
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence Today: Recent Trends and Developments, 1999

1998
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game.
Artif. Intell. Law, 1998

1997
Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities.
J. Appl. Non Class. Logics, 1997

Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report).
Proceedings of the Formal Models of Agents, 1997

Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1997

1996
Contrary-to-Duty Obligations.
Stud Logica, 1996

Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning.
Stud Logica, 1996

A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning.
Artif. Intell. Law, 1996

A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities.
Proceedings of the Practical Reasoning, 1996

1995
On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities.
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1995

From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument.
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1995

1993
An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic.
Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 1993

A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument.
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial intelligence and Law, 1993

1991
A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument.
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1991


  Loading...